Impeachment hearings continue Friday as former ambassador to Ukraine testifies

Push to improve Greensboro after Trader Joe’s rezoning battle

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.
Data pix.

GREENSBORO, N.C. -- Groups that were at odds over the plan to bring a Trader Joe's to Greensboro are coming together to see if there are lessons to be learned from the controversy.

Community activists, developers and Greensboro city planners were the panelists at Thursday's Action Greensboro Lunch and Learn meeting.

One goal, try to answer the question: Did all the fighting over the grocery store chain hurt Greensboro?

"I'm really concerned that it seems like we're not hospitable to new development," said Joe Wheby, a small business owner who has changed his mind on the Trader Joe's debate.

"Initially, I thought it was a bad idea. But once I realized the footprint of the land and the buffer zone that the zoning commissioners mandated through their conditions, I thought it was appropriate for that parcel," said Wheby.

Meeting attendees also heard from Mike Kirkman with the City of Greensboro Planning Department. He said he'd like more people to learn about the zoning process so standard procedures don't come as a shock to the public on future rezoning questions.

Kirkman said this process taught him that many people are now willing to get involved in city matters through social media or email.

Scott Kinsey with Friendly Coalition said they have 5,000 people on their email list. Kinsey said that includes people from more than one dozen neighborhoods, not just those closest to Friendly and Hobbs.

"I think the neighbors have to have a voice too," said Kinsey. "I think that process worked in this particular case."

Developers would disagree. John Lomax, with Lomax Properties, talked about how several companies, which specialize in business development nationwide, bypass Greensboro for places like Nashville or Charlotte. He said this decision may discourage other companies looking at the Triad for expansion.

Tony Collins, a former Greensboro Zoning Commissioner, agreed with Lomax. He said the area lost more than simply a grocery store. It lost an opportunity to improve the quality of life in the city.

"Trader Joe's was not going to solve our problems in Greensboro but this did keep two major developers from coming here," said Collins.

Kinsey argued it didn't have to be so difficult. He believes the chain could have moved into one of several vacant properties around the city rather than trying to force its way onto the corner of Friendly and Hobbs.

"A single developer or a single retail shop shouldn't come in and say, 'Because I want to come to Greensboro it's okay to tear down homes or rezone neighborhoods,'" said Kinsey.

Developers said retail stores attract other retail stores and that's why the corner was so attractive.

In this case, at least five property owners signed off on the plan to bring the store to that corner before it ran into opposition and Trader Joe's ultimately gave up plans to move into Greensboro.


  • No More

    We don’t need TJ. Just a freakin grocery store! Get real people. These developers act like spoiled kids. They can’t bring any jobs here unless they bribe them with millions in incentive money from the taxpayers. Just look at the new Wyndam hotel where they gave away farm to land them and compete against the other hotels who put up their own money. This lunacy has to stop.

  • CIAA Alum

    Greensboro could have avoided the entire fiasco if they had respected present zoning laws and residents’ rights to have non-commercial property in their front yards. Historically, Greensboro has run roughshod over homeowners wishes and have rezoned in favor of contractors in 98% of the cases brought before the City Council. I applaud those homeowners in sticking to their guns and raising hell to preserve the culture of their neighborhoods.

    Greensboro is a mess because of bad policies and the continuous re-election of the same “core mentality” that put those policies into place–Nancy Vaughn? Really? She is just a female extension of Robbie Perkins and voted with him on every issue–same mentality.

    There are a multitude of vacant commercial properties in Greensboro, however, instead of propping up those properties to developers, Greensboro continues to entertain development into residential neighborhoods that value serenity and their property values.

    The golden properties in Greensboro are the downtown area and the Friendly Avenue areas, other sections of the city can go to hell as far as the City Council is concerned.

  • D thompson

    I love listening to people discussion on property rights, jobs, and freedom. They vote that way but in reality if it is in MY backyard OH NO NO NO…

  • David Hedgecock

    There’s a lot of hypocrisy;;here;;some on both sides. Those people that do not want the store at Hobbs & Friendly;;;wouldn’t mind a bit if Trader Joes chose say Florida Street;;;or High Point Road;;say around I-40 or say the Colisieum;;;;but no way do they want it in their upscale neighborhood. They won’t have that stupid store near them. No, they want it in someone else’s backyard or front yard. Most anywhere is going to be near someone’s neighborhood. Everyone should examine their own hearts and be fair with their neighbors. Some shopping centers actually if they’re done right;;actually improve neigborhood home values;;; Check it out. Talk about biting off the hand that feeds you. I think there were a lot of people just showing their stupidity in this case and now the City lost a good interesting store.

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.