Gun owners fear new legislation could tread on their rights

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

(Stock photo)

WASHINGTON (CNN) — Lou Klein, 64, shot his first gun when he was 11.

“My dad bought me a single-shot .22 rifle at an Ace Hardware store in Chicago for $19.95,” Klein remembered. “I used to take that gun on the bus when I was 11 years old and go down to the shooting range. You couldn’t do that now; you would have the FBI on you.”

Those bus trips to the firing range started a lifelong passion for the Vietnam veteran and lifetime National Rifle Association member and recruiter who owns Lou’s Sporting Goods in Bowie, Maryland.

His shop sells everything from handguns to AR-15 semi-automatic rifles — the military-style weapon used in several mass shootings, including the one last week in Newtown, Connecticut, that claimed 28 lives, including 20 children, their principal, the shooter’s mother and gunman Adam Lanza, who took his own life.

Klein’s business is booming. And like many gun owners, he said he doesn’t think limiting firearms will prevent another massacre.

“Gun control is not the answer; it’s about education and about responsibility,” said Klein, who supports background checks, a waiting period, gun safety courses and mental health screening.

Klein and millions of other small-town gun shop owners, hunters, housewives, former police officers and just plain everyday folks who proudly defend their right to bear arms have walked a tenuous line in the week following the Newtown shootings.

They’ve tried to balance responding to the nation’s grief and horror at a crime that ended so many young lives, while worrying about what gun rights advocates see as a threat of knee-jerk legislation that could tread on their constitutional rights.

“I believe the Second Amendment provided that the average American citizen should have the same rights to armaments as the military. But do I want my next-door nut job neighbor to have a bazooka? No,” said Noel Flasterstein, a Florida attorney and gun rights advocate.

Mike Zammitti, a young gun owner in New England, agrees.

Zammitti, 22, lives in Boylston, Massachusetts, and has three guns — a .22 rifle, a .25-caliber pocket pistol and a .22 Luger handgun. He also is a Class-A license holder, which allows him to “conceal and carry” his guns with him. But that doesn’t mean that he does it.

iReport: Was your gun banned?

His weapons, he said, are for protection. He also said he doesn’t need an assault rifle to protect himself in his home and doesn’t think other people need them either.

“I absolutely think we should ban assault weapons,” Zammitti said. “There is no reason to have assault weapons on the market. …Those are people killers; they are not meant to go hunting.”

Still, even though he believes in some gun control laws, Zammitti said he fully supports the right to bear arms.

When the NRA, a powerful gun lobby with roughly 4.3 million members, went into a self-imposed silence in the days following the school shootings, individual members took to Twitter, Facebook, the airwaves and the comment sections of websites such as to explain exactly that type of nuanced stance.

It usually went along these lines: They are not all gun-toting villains. They are, they proudly proclaim, patriots.

“Guns are what’s kept this country free, and it’s what’s keeping our country free,” Klein said, pointing to the militias in the Revolutionary War that fought against the British.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.