Chelsea Manning breaks silence, accuses U.S. of lying about Iraq

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

U.S. Army PFC Bradley Manning departs a military courthouse Monday, Aug. 19, 2013 after closing presentations by prosecutors and his defense attorney in the sentencing phase of his court martial. U.S. Army Col. Denise Lind Tuesday announced she would hand down a sentence Wednesday morning unless she needs additional time to deliberate. Prosecutors have asked for a least 60 years' confinement, while the defense asked for far less, asserting Manning, 25, can be rehabilitated and become a productive member of society.

A U.S. soldier imprisoned for leaking documents to WikiLeaks broke her silence in a fiery editorial accusing the United States of lying about Iraq.

Chelsea Manning was sentenced to 35 years in prison in 2013 for leaking 750,000 pages of classified documents to the anti-secrecy group.

At the time, Manning went by the first name Bradley, but later announced the desire to live as a woman and be known as Chelsea.

Manning has stayed out of the limelight since the conviction, which spared the former intelligence analyst from the most serious charge of aiding the enemy.

But she was back Saturday, with an opinion piece titled ‘The Fog Machine of War” in The New York Times. In it, she accuses the U.S. media of looking the other way when chaos and corruption reigned in Iraq and Afghanistan.

“As Iraq erupts in civil war and America again contemplates intervention, that unfinished business should give new urgency to the question of how the United States military controlled the media coverage of its long involvement there and in Afghanistan,” Manning wrote.

“I believe that the current limits on press freedom and excessive government secrecy make it impossible for Americans to grasp fully what is happening in the wars we finance.”

She said that during the 2010 elections in Iraq, the media duped the world into thinking that all was well.

“You might remember that the American press was flooded with stories declaring the elections a success, complete with upbeat anecdotes and photographs of Iraqi women proudly displaying their ink-stained fingers,” she wrote. “The subtext was that United States military operations had succeeded in creating a stable and democratic Iraq. Those of us stationed there were acutely aware of a more complicated reality.”

She said at the time, she got regular reports detailing security forces’ crackdown against dissidents “on behalf” of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki.

“I was shocked by our military’s complicity in the corruption of that election,” she said. “Yet these deeply troubling details flew under the American media’s radar.”

Sunni militant fighters are vowing to capture cities in Iraq and threatening the government of al-Maliki. Some Iraqi security forces, most of whom were trained by the United States, have bolted their posts in areas overrun by militants.

U.S. President Barack Obama has said he will not send troops to Iraq, but is considering other options.

“This is not going to happen overnight,” the President said Friday. He added that unless Iraq fixes its internal political problems, short-term military help from the United States won’t make much difference.

Pressure for the United States to provide military support to Iraq’s struggling government has increased, with conservative Republicans blaming Obama for creating a security vacuum in 2011 by pulling out U.S. troops.

GOP critics also say that Obama’s unwillingness to provide significant military backing to opposition forces in Syria’s civil war has made it easier for the militant Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, or ISIS, to attack in Iraq.

Obama, however, has resisted getting drawn into another military engagement there after the ending the nine-year conflict started by his predecessor.

Manning also slammed the practice of embedding journalists with the military.

“Reporters naturally fear having their access terminated, so they tend to avoid controversial reporting that could raise red flags,” Manning wrote.


  • Bo Diddley

    She?….just because you choose to dress and act like a woman, doesn’t make you woman. Come on reporters, get your act together.

    • Melody T.

      Using pronouns that are incongruous with the gender of an individual is incorrect both in reporting and in grammar. The writer of this article made the correct & respectful choice.

      Also: who reads a story about people dying & the government’s corruption, and thinks, “oh, well, I don’t like the identity of this person so I’m going to attack them instead of getting upset about people dying”? Because, you know, transgender people are the real atrocity in this situation.

  • HW

    We could have stayed there for 100 years and it wouldn’t have done any good. Someone in that region would have always been waiting in the wings to make a power grab. If their own people won’t stand to defend their country, then it’s just going to fall no matter what militant group elects to take it over. As far as elections, I highly doubt our own elections are very legitimate, let alone those that are arranged to occur during a time of occupation and uncertainty in a nation plagued with corruption such as Iraq. Regime’s just need to be left to rise and fall there as they have done for thousands of years. Semi-stabilizing one country will do little to support the ongoing problems of the region as a whole. We can’t save the world and need to stop wasting our resources on lost causes like reforming the political landscape of the Middle East. It’s just not going to be a utopia no matter how much we hope it can be.

  • Darius Louison

    This shouldn’t be suprising because it’s already obvious that the govt. hides things from its people. The media has a strong influence on the people and it’s sad because not everything in the media is worth hearing or either true.

Comments are closed.